Solzhenitsyn is not Jewish so this foolish statement of his against the Bush visit to the holodomor memorial cannot be blamed on concern over cheapening Holocaust impact, or on concern about Jews being blamed because some of them figured prominently among the Bolsheviks.
Rather, it seems borne of his strong Russian nationalist pride and inability to deal with or acknowledge what his own Russia did to Ukraine, land of his mother's family.
This is so sick. Why not just acknowledge what is obvious? A bunch of evil secularist planners (of varying race and ethnicity), intentionally killed millions of freedom-loving religious people, not only in Germany and various spots in Russia, but also in Ukraine. Enough with the tortured "reasoning" for keeping quiet about what really happened in Ukraine. The fact that it happened elsewhere does not negate that it happened in Ukraine, and by design.
Link: Solzhenitsyn battles illness to complete final volumes | News | guardian.co.uk Books.
In a vituperative piece, however, Solzhenitsyn dismissed the claim as 'rakish juggling' and said that millions of non-Ukrainians also perished in the famine, which was engineered by the Soviet Union's leadership. 'This provocative outcry about "genocide"... has been elevated to the top government level in contemporary Ukraine. Does this mean that they have even outdone the Bolshevik propaganda-mongers with their rakish juggling?' an incensed Solzhenistyn wrote. Bush had been duped by a 'loony fable', he added. Yesterday Natalia Solzhenitsyn said that her husband felt passionately about the 'Ukrainian people' because his mother's family came from Ukraine. Asked about Solzhenitsyn's views on Bush, she said: 'Bush was only in Kiev for a few hours. He didn't go to the monument to the victims of fascism but to the holodomor memorial. We don't know whether Bush went there cynically, or because the level of his historical knowledge [is low].'
....
Yesterday DM Thomas, Solzhenitsyn's biographer, said it would be simplistic to describe the novelist as either nationalistic or reactionary. 'Patriotic and religiously conservative might suit,' he told The Observer. 'He disliked the secularism of the West almost as much as he disliked communism. He is in no way nationalistic in the sense of elevating Russia above others, or wishing for territorial aggrandisement... Above all, I think, he is or was a strong Orthodox believer. He hated the Bolshevik revolution, and because Jews played such an important role in that, he has laid himself open to the charge of being anti-semitic. I argued in my biography that this was based on a misunderstanding of his views.'